I certainly feel sorry for children uncomfortable with their bio-assignments --but is it discomfort or something the parents have allowed to go uncorrected since infancy? Should a child not be helped to be glad for his own sex assignment and body? And the normalcy of it? instead of accommodated in his delusion?
Kindness should be our response in every case of confused sex identity/orientation--but accommodation by allowing cross-dressing and cross-bathroom use in school is not part of REAL kindness.
CWA also tells about programs in public schools that include "explicit and detailed instructions on and discussions of various homosexual practices including sodomy."
That is UNACCEPTABLE!
The Uni of Minnesota Press published the book "Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex," which advocates sexual activities with young children, and gives cover to pedophiles/child molesters.
Of course, children in public school are taught that homosexual "marriage' is another acceptable form of marriage . Elementary children are encouraged to read about homosexual animals and to see gay couples and parents as just another good and normal sexual and family arrangement.
In some school districts, they do not require parental notification and approval for such indoctrination.
PARENTS, BE VIGILANT. ASK YOUR SCHOOLS WHAT THEY TEACH ABOUT SEXUALITY AND WHEN AND INSIST THAT YOU BE NOTIFIED AND GIVE PERMISSION FOR ANY SEX EDUCATION, including books that promote the abnormal as normal.
Even straight sex ed has been lacking in moral values for years. I remember the video at Anthony Wayne Middle School that cited all the famous people throughout history that were known to have STD's --which film featured a boy student who became "responsible" by notifying his many sexual conquests that he had an STD and had probably given them one. Another film, rejected by the board curriculum committee, showed a couple going to the drugstore for condoms before gleefully taking advantage of an aunt's empty home when the nephew was given charge over that home. There was no suggestion that this was inappropriate, dangerous or immoral. Just normal!
The best sex ed DOES say "WAIT FOR MARRIAGE!" to another who has also waited. This is the only SAFE SEX. Yes, we should tell kids that if they don't wait, they MUST use condoms to HELP prevent getting or spreading disease. That if they are going to be promiscuous (involved with sex before marriage --leading to many partners), some form of birth control from their doctor or clinic is adviseable in case the condom fails or the partner fails to use a condom.
And we need to teach sex ed to boys and girls separately --as Dr. Dobson notes that natural and appropriate barriers to sexual intimacy between the sexes are eroded by co-ed presentations. The barriers delay sexual involvement; our explicit, value-neutral sex ed seemed to coincide historically with increases in youthful sex involvement and teen pregnancy.
What we really need is a consistent message to youth that monogamous hetero marriage is still the bedrock arrangment of civilized societies --and the only way to provide children for the future. And why that is important. Building an intact, functional family is a worthy GOAL for every young person. Children need to hear that a couple CAN choose happiness together and resolve conflicts and maintain happy homes. The problems in marriage are NOT marriage itself--but sinful, selfish ways in the lives of individuals. A functional, loving family, headed by intact parents, is a resource for mental, physical, social, and economic well-being of all its members.
"God is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance and have eternal life."--the Bible
