It
 seems there is something fishy about the timing of General Petraeus's 
confession.  Did O's people MAKE him confess and resign, in hopes he 
wouldn't have to testify?   Did they threaten him with worse problems 
regarding prosecution and  pension, etc., if he didn't step down before 
Benghazi hits the fan?  Was either P or O  hoping to distract from any 
errors of theirs  re: Benghazi?  Why is it ok for Clinton to skirt 
around but not a general?  Clinton was Commander in chief, after all!  
Not that adultery isn't serious betrayal and risky for CIA as well as 
presidents, making them both vulnerable to blackmail-based decisions.   
But why is it a step-down offense for a general but not for the 
Commander in Chief?  Why wouldn't the general just protect his wife as 
well as himself from the shame --and just quietly make up with his wife 
if he could --or quietly resign.  Why the public confession?  He seems 
genuinely contrite, but methinks somebody got to him --and it has to do 
with Benghazi.  I think O's people wanted him to resign and want to 
imply eventually that any error in Benghazi was P's fault due to his 
distractions in the moral arena.  Maybe someone  put a million in an off
 shore bank account for  P.   Yes, I'm just speculating --but I smell a 
rat here!   The public disclosure makes no sense.
"God is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance and have eternal life."--the Bible
 
No comments:
Post a Comment